A global perspective on environmental issues. Our mission is to inform, educate, enable and create a platform for global environmental action.
Region
-
-
Examining the Role of Dollar Stores in Food Access
Food Tank Feb 16, 2024A recent report offers insights into the role that dollar stores can play in increasing access to healthy foods.
-
Understanding Homelessness and Opioid Overdoses
Futurity Feb 16, 2024“If you want to make progress fighting the opioid epidemic, tackling homelessness is one route to do that.”…
-
Does Tracking Data Help Curb Chronic Absenteeism?
The Hechinger Report Feb 15, 2024Attendance rates of low-income students didn’t improve after a school district used an early warning system to combat absenteeism.
-
Sustainable Rural Water and Wastewater Systems
Urban Institute Feb 15, 2024Water and wastewater systems in rural communities across the country are deteriorating, which can have detrimental effects on well-being, economic development, and the environment.
-
This article is deemed a must-read by one or more of our expert collaborators.
Click here for more.I’ve been a funder in the impact space for a long time. I love investing in and supporting social entrepreneurs. I’ve learned (and am frankly still learning) how to do…
-
We Need to Lean into Alternatives to Youth Incarceration and Residential Care
Forbes Feb 15, 2024We can either invest in our young people and see benefits or neglect them behind bars and see negative consequences.
-
A New Coalition of Small News Nonprofits Demands Funders’ Attention
Nieman Lab Feb 15, 2024“There are haves and have-nots in the nonprofit journalism space.And this isn’t right.”…
-
Environmental Funding in Europe: A Drop in the (Rising) Ocean
The Center for Effective Philanthropy Feb 15, 2024The stakes are higher than ever in European environmental conservation. In May last year, Philea (Philanthropy Europe Association), a network of philanthropic funders and infrastructure organizations in Europe, put the…
-
How Feedback Can Address Power Dynamics
Feedback Labs Feb 15, 2024Sophia Johnson, Feedback Labs | August 31, 2023 REDF is a dedicated investor in employment social enterprises (ESEs), which are businesses that have a transformative social impact by providing jobs, training, and support to individuals overcoming employment barriers. They collaborate with social entrepreneurs who lead these businesses, aiming to amplify their success and the positive outcomes for their employees. REDF’s programs encompass various elements: capital infusion to drive sustainable growth, capacity building to enhance leadership and operational excellence, and community engagement to foster learning and connection. To ensure consistent feedback practices across all programs, REDF is working towards creating a unified framework. While all programs are currently collecting and analyzing feedback data, the challenge lies in aligning these diverse approaches to facilitate comprehensive organizational reporting. In instances where REDF collects feedback, they aspire to improve their application of an equity lens, aiming to better understand the unique needs of their program participants. Furthermore, REDF seeks to establish a trust-based relationship with the ESEs they support, acknowledging and addressing the inherent power dynamics between funders and grantees. By changing their approach, REDF aims to share and redistribute power with the ESEs they support. During the LabStorm session, various strategies were discussed to bridge the gap between funders and grantees. Prioritizing feedback from BIPOC leaders and leaders with lived experience In the process of facilitating external feedback with grantees, it is crucial to go beyond the traditional dynamics of funder-grantee relationships. It is important to acknowledge that not all feedback will align with or satisfy everyone involved. During the LabStorm session, participants emphasized the need to avoid prioritizing the opinions of the majoritized groups exclusively. To close the feedback loop, REDF should transparently explain their decisions, acknowledging that alternative ideas and opinions were considered, thereby making sure that every voice feels heard and respected. A recommended strategy is to prioritize feedback from underserved groups, starting with Black, indigenous, and leaders of color, as well as ESE leaders with the lived experience of the people they serve. Additionally, sharing the feedback framework in advance can encourage greater participation and valuable and unique insights from these ESE leaders. Incorporating a third party One potential solution discussed during the LabStorm session is for REDF to involve a third party in their feedback process. By including an external entity, REDF can introduce an unbiased perspective and expertise to facilitate feedback collection and analysis. This can encourage greater honesty from participants, as they may feel more comfortable sharing their thoughts and experiences with someone who is not directly connected to REDF. With the increased sense of confidentiality that can promote openness and more candid feedback, this approach would help REDF transcend the power dynamics inherent in the funder-grantee relationship and foster a more trusting and equitable environment. The involvement of a third party can also bring fresh ideas to improve the feedback framework, ensuring a comprehensive and objective assessment of the needs of their clients. Collaborating with a third party in the feedback process would enhance the credibility and transparency of REDF’s efforts, ultimately leading to more informed decision-making and a meaningful impact. Embracing vulnerability Lastly, it was suggested that REDF continues to show vulnerability. By doing so, REDF creates an environment that encourages open and honest communication, fostering a culture of trust and authenticity. This willingness to be vulnerable demonstrates a genuine commitment to listen, learn, and improve. It allows REDF to receive and act upon difficult feedback, gaining valuable insights. Moreover, vulnerability can strengthen relationships with grantees and other program participants, as it shows a willingness to share power, learn from mistakes, and evolve as an organization. Upon concluding the LabStorm, REDF departed with valuable insights, recognizing that feedback can sometimes be conflicting. They explored the idea of incorporating a third party into the feedback process as a means to foster trust, while also expressing vulnerability and a shared commitment to learning alongside the ESE leaders they partner with grantees. Learn More About LabStorms LabStorms are collaborative problem-solving sessions designed to help organizations tackle feedback-related challenges or share what’s working well in their practice. Presenters leave the experience with honest, actionable feedback and suggestions to improve their feedback processes and tools. To learn more about participating in a virtual LabStorm, please visit feedbacklabs.org/labstorms.
-
Tech Companies Need to Combat Gender-based Violence Online
Global Citizen Feb 15, 2024During a week when the world has focused on how governments and corporations can support initiatives that uplift women and girls globally at the Generation Equality Forum (GEF), more than…
-
Using Medicaid to Support Rental Assistance
Vox Feb 14, 2024States prepare to use Medicaid for rental assistance for the first time.
About Us
Giving Compass Network
Partnerships & Services
We are a nonprofit too. Donate to Giving Compass to help us guide donors toward practices that advance equity.
loyaltyDonate to Giving CompassTrending Issues
- Copyright © 2026, Giving Compass Network
- A 501(c)(3) organization. EIN: 85-1311683
- Privacy Policy
- User Agreement
Sign in
Don't have an account?
Click here to sign up!
Your personal information is confidential at Giving Compass. For more information, please visit our privacy policy. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use.