Giving Compass' Take:
- Kerstin Chyba, Katherine Tatarinov and Tina C. Ambos discuss how U.N. organizations are starting to become more innovative.
- Why is innovation in U.N. organizations important? How can these success stories continue to be replicated to create a better world?
- Read about humanitarian innovation.
What is Giving Compass?
We connect donors to learning resources and ways to support community-led solutions. Learn more about us.
From displacement and poverty to illness and environmental degradation, the urgent challenges facing the world today call for innovative approaches that combine an entrepreneurial spirit with a clear understanding of the problems and a firm footing in communities. While local organizations and the public sector are vital in tackling these overlapping crises, an often under-discussed arena of innovation is the role of the United Nations (UN) and its related agencies—the World Food Programme (WFP), the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), and so on. In all, the entire UN system employs close to 120,000 people across 193 countries and deploys an annual budget of more than $3 billion.
The UN organizations are tasked with solving the world’s global problems, but often the very rules that keep these organizations accountable stifle potential to increase speed and efficiency in service delivery. Founded 75 years ago, these organizations were not designed to innovate. While certain initiatives, such as the WFP’s hydroponics initiative H2Grow, UNICEF’s digital platform U-Report, and UNFPA’s GRID3 geospatial data project have been able to scale globally, the road from idea to scale is often long and rocky. Even successful projects face institutional roadblocks when bureaucratic processes hinder experimentation. Idea champions within the UN tell rich stories about the barriers to identifying, scaling, and implementing innovation. Funding models and strict accountability processes imply that resources cannot be spent on an experiment with potential to fail—which is an inherent risk of innovation. Tight budget lines lead to strict team mandates where pressure is high, over-work is rife and time for creativity is low. Hierarchical structures and strict reporting lines mean that some voices remain unheard.
As the UN starts to acknowledge that innovation is imperative to achieving its sustainable development goals (SDGs) by 2030, the challenge is to integrate organizational learning processes to better develop and scale initiatives. In our recent research, we set out to shed light on this largely unexplored phenomenon, asking: How does the UN innovate despite adverse internal conditions—and does it learn to overcome the various barriers and obstacles?
Read the full article about innovation in the U.N. by Kerstin Chyba, Katherine Tatarinov and Tina C. Ambos at Stanford Social Innovation Review.